# I. Introduction ultiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) and Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) combination will provide high data rates and mitigate the effects of the multipath delay in wireless communication [1]. The advantages originate from the multiple spatial channels, which are provided by the multiple antennas together with the scattering environment surrounding the transmitters and the receivers. As the wireless environment is time varying, channel estimation became as essential part of the receiver [2][3][4]. The accurate estimation of the channel statistics will provide the better diversity gain and coherence detection and decoding. Pilot aided channel estimation is proved as better approach to estimate the channel with more accuracy [13,14]. But it suffers interference created by the OFDM frequency among different transmit-receive antenna pairs. To overcome this Combining the design of the joint orthogonal pilot for the MIMO-OFDM system has proposed in [15][16][17], which has designed the pilot data format maintaining the orthogonal property between different OFDM subcarriers of different transmitting-receiving antenna pair and same transmitting-receiving antenna pair, at the same time, the pilot symbols are inserted into the data frame at the transmitter according to the polygon form in the change of the OFDM subcarriers in transmitting-receiving antenna pair. Most of the conventional methods work in a symbol-by-symbol scheme using the correlation of the channel only in the frequency domain i.e., the correlation between the sub-channels. More advanced algorithms are based on the Kalman Filter (KF), to also exploit the time-domain correlation [11,12]. KFs require a linear recursive state-space representation of the channel. However, the exact Clarke model does not admit such a representation. An approximation often used in the literature consists of approaching the fading process as auto-regressive [5,6]. Hence, a widely used channel approximation is based on a first-order Auto-Regressive model (AR), as recommended [5],. The KF appears to be convenient for the very high mobility case, which leads to quasi-optimal channel estimation. In the present study, we consider multi-path channel estimation in multi-carrier systems (i.e., OFDM systems). In this context, we are interested in evaluate the performance of KF and RSF under parameter uncertainty [26][27][28][29]. To do this, we use the least-square (LS) estimator at the pilots of current OFDM symbol. This first step explores the frequency-domain correlation of the channel and the knowledge of the delays to convert the primary observation at pilot frequencies. This paper is organized as follows: Section II introduces the MIMO-OFDM system model, In Section III explored the arrangement of pilots in combined orthogonal scheme and its significance in estimation during the same frequency inference, Section IV discussion on time varying channel model and channel model with parameter uncertainty. Section V introduces the KF and RSF channel estimation methodology in parameter uncertainty. As Figure 1 shows, we use N T transmit antennas, N R receive antennas, n OFDM symbols and K subcarriers in a MIMO-OFDM system. The transmitted symbol vector is given as [ ] ( ) [ ] ( ) [ ] 1 , . . . T T N x n k n k x n x k ? ? = ? ? ? , 0 .. 1 n Z k K ? =? ? ,1 2 / 0 , , K 1 1 0, K j mk K CP m n T x n k e m L m el e X KN s ? ? = ? = ? ? ? ? = ? ? ? ?(1) Thus the duration of each OFDM symbol is cp N =K +?? ???? . The overall baseband transmitted signal is [ ] [ ] n n n m x m nN X +? = ?? = ? ?(2) The signal from each receiver is formed by the # III. Combined Orthogonal Pilot Scheme Use of pilot symbols for channel estimation introduces overhead and it is desirable to keep the number of pilot symbols as minimum as possible. The completely orthogonal pilot data symbol among the different subcarriers position of different transmitting receiving antenna pair [15,17]. And the pilot data symbols are distributed in the entire time-frequency grid of the channel for each transmitting antenna of the OFDM transmitter, the pilot symbols are coded, so that the antenna is unique. The coded pilot symbol was inserted into the OFDM frame, in order to form the The function ( , ) y t ? in the above equation is just same as Finite Impulse Response (FIR) filter which has time-varying coefficients. In real world scenario there are many factors, as disturbance, affect the medium, which leads to model the system with additive noise and result the system model become (3).i.e. ( , ) ( ) ( ) ( ) r r r z t h t x v ? ? ? ? = ? + ?(6) To design effective communication, it is necessary to have good knowledge about these coefficients. There are too many parameters to estimate in (5). As observation samples are corrupted with noise, weights of samples will rapidly change from one to others. The weighted taped channel is modeled as Gauss-Markov model. The Gauss-Markov model will be used to fix the correlation between successive values of given taped weight in time. In channel estimation, the state vector is given as [ ] [ ] [ ] 1 h n Ah n u n = ? +(7) where [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] 0 1 . . 1 n n n h h h n h p ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? = ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? is a p p × matrix and [ ] u n is AWGN, with zero mean and variance Q . Standard assumption made that tap weights are joined Gaussian and uncorrelated with each other. Measurement/observation model is written by rearranging ( 10) [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] 1 2 . . . 1 z n x n x n x n x n p ? ? = ? ? ? + ? ? [ ] [ ] h n w n + (8) and it can be expressed as [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] T z n x n h n w n = +(9) where ??[??] is Gaussian white noise with variance 2 R ? = and ( ) x n is known sequence, act as input to the channel. # b) Tapped delay line channel Model with uncertainty In a circumstance, when there is uncertainty in the channel state vector, (7) may be written as # [ ] [ ] [ ] 1 h n Ah n A u n = ? + ? + (10) where A ? is a constant which arises due to channel phase rotation during coding and it is considered as a parameter modeling uncertainty in matrix A . This model is similar to case of random walk process described in [7] and in state-space domain the model # V. CHANNEL ESTIMATION a) Kalman based channel estimation The Kalman filter is a mathematical method used to use observed values containing noise and other disturbances and produce values closer to true value and calculate value [21]. The basic operation done by the KF is to generate estimates of the true and calculated values, first by predicting a value, then calculating the uncertainty of the above value and finding an weighted average of both the predicted and the measured values [20]. Most weight is given to the value with least uncertainty. The result obtained the method gives estimates more closely to true values. It is a recursive predictive filter based on the use of state space techniques and recursive algorithms. It demands the description of the dynamical problem in a statespace form which includes a system model and an observation model which is considered only for linear systems. Kalman filter is a recursive minimum mean square error (MMSE) estimator and it provides optimal estimation solution for linear and unbiased process with additive white noise. There is enough literature on KF, for example [5,21]. The implementation of KF for channel estimation problem given in above subsection is given in detail as follow steps [29]. Filter initialization 1 1 ?h h n n µ ? ? ? ? = ? ? and 1 1 h P n n C ? ? ? ? = ? ?(11) Prior state estimation ?1 1 1 h n n Ah n n ? ? ? = ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?(12) Prior estimate error covariance 1 1 1 T P n n AP n n A Q ? ? ? = ? ? ? ? + ? ? ? ? (13) Kalman Filter gain [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] ( ) 1 1 1 ( T K n P n n V n V n P n n V n R ? = ? ? ? ? ? ? + ? ? ? ?(14) Posterior state estimate [ ] [ ] [ ] ( ) 1 1 ??T h n n h n n K n x n V n h n n ? ? = ? ? ? + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (15) Posterior estimate error covariance [ ] [ ] ( ) 1 T P n n I K n V n P n n ? ? = ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?(16) b) Proposed Risk Sensitive Filter approach A RSF which is recursively update a posteriori state and estimate error covariance as given in [23] is used here for fading channel estimation. Implementation of fading channel estimation using RSF is follows: For linear system, the posteriori state estimate h ? of h at k th time is obtained by the risk sensitive ( ) [ ] 1 0 arg min [exp { ( , ) , ?} ] ?| k m m m m h E l h h l h x n ? ? = ? + ?(17) (Notation T denotes transpose) This is strictly filtering problems. For more details readers can refer [23][24][25][26]. As [25], the posteriori state estimation is given as [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] 1 ?| 1| 1 | T h n n Ah n n P n n V n R ? = ? ? + [ ] [ ] [ ] ( ) | 1 ?1 T x n V n Ah n n ? ? ?(20) Posteriori estimation error covariance is given as [ ] ( ) 1 1 1 1 [ | ] 1| 1 T P n n A P n n I A Q ? ? ? ? ? ? = ? ? ? ? + ? ? ? ? [ ] [ ] 1 T V n R V n ? +(21) VI. SIMULATION RESULTS The simulation parameters are as follows. The FFT size, N, is 64. The data symbol k X is based on QPSK. The channel n h is the Rayleigh fading channel which has two paths. The space-time coding scheme is Alamouti's STBC with ½ rate and the decoding scheme used is Maximum likelihood (ML) technique with only linear processing. The number of OFDM symbols considered here are 8. The initial values of the for the KF are as follows: 0 h =[0 0]T , 0 P =100 I , 0 S=0 I , 0 q =[0 0]T , and 0 a=1. The comparison factor, MSE, is obtained after 100 independent trials. The linear interpolator is used as we considered slow fading channel. In contrast, the proposed RSF algorithm works well in parameter uncertainty conditions and usual performance and close to KF in absence of parameter uncertainty [22]. Although this paper focuses mainly on channel estimation under parameter uncertainty. approach such that ![II. System ModelConsider a MIMO system equipped with diagram of baseband MIMO-OFDM system is shown in Figure1.](image-2.png "?") 1![Figure 1: Block Diagram of MIMO-OFDM System](image-3.png "Figure 1 :") ![indicates the symbol transmitted at the symbol time n, subcarrier k, and antenna i. The n th OFDM symbol ?? ?? [??] can be acquired by performing an inverse fast discrete Fourier transform (IFFT) to the ??[??, ??] and inserting a CP of length ?? ???? [ ] [ ]](image-4.png "Where") ![H m l of the fading MIMO r T N N × channel [11], the transmitted signal [ ] n X m , and the noise [ ] [ ] . m m ? ? is stationary white Gaussian noise which distribution is expressed by N (0,?? ?? 2 ) . The receiver signal [ ] z m is demodulated by removing cyclic prefix and performing fast Fourier transform (FFT).](image-5.png ",") Year 201718Volume XVII Issue II Version I( ) EGlobal Journal of Computer Science and TechnologyHere, ?? is a tuning parameter, known as riskfactor or risk parameter, the functionl, ( h h)is defined as1 ?2 l h h , = ( ) ( ) ( ) T h h h h ? ?(18)[ ] x n ={x[ ] 1 , , ?[ ] } x n Risk Sensitive Filter for MIMO-OFDM System Channel Estimation using Combined Orthogonal Pilot Approch under Parameter Uncertainty © 2017 Global Journals Inc. (US) Year 2017 ( ) © 20 7 Global Journa ls Inc. (US) 1 * RSAhmad BurtonRBahai MustafaSaltzberg Ergen Multicarrier Digital Communications: theory and application of OFDM Springer 2004 Second Edition * Channel estimation for wireless OFDM systems Mehmet Kemal Ozdemir, logus Huseyin arslan 2007 IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials * Channel Estimation and Signal Detection for MIMO-OFDM with Time Varying Channels Won-GyuSong Jong-TaeLim IEEE communications letters 10 2006 * Fading Channel: Information-Theoretic and Communication Aspect EzioBiglieri JohnProakis ShlomoShamai IEEE trans. on information theory 44 1998 * MSteven Key Fundamental of Statistical Signal Processing: Estimation Theory Prentice Hall, NJ 1993 * KareemEBaddour NormanCBeaulieu 2001 * Autoregressive Model for Fading Channel Simulation IEEE Global Telecommunication Conference 2 * Two Cross-Coupled ? H Filters for Fading Channel Estimation in OFDM Systems AliJamoos AhmadAbdo HannaAbdelNour EricGrive Novel Algorithms and Techniques in Telecommunications and Networking Netherlands Springer 2010 * Simplified Random-Walk-Model-Based Kalman Filter for Slow to Moderate Fading Channel Estimation in OFDM Systems HuaqiangShu LaurentRos EricPierreSimon 10.1007/978-90-481-3662-9 IEEE transactions on signal processing 62 15 2014 * Estimation of Time-Variant Channels for OFDM Systems Using Kalman and Wiener Filters, Vehicular Technology Conference Hye Mi Park and Jae Hong Lee 2006 * Channel Estimation for MIMO-OFDM Systems in Fast Time-Varying Environments HusseinHijazi EricPierreSimon MartineLi´enard LaurentRos 4th International Symposium on Communications, Control and Signal Processing 2010. ISCCSP2010 * Robust Fast Time-Varying Multipath Fading Channel Estimation and Equalization for MIMO-OFDM Systems via a Fuzzy Method Chang-YiBor-Sen Chen Wei-JiYang Liao IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 61 2012 * Kalman interpolation filter for channel estimation of LTE downlink in high-mobility environments XuewuDai WuxiongZhang JingXu EJohn YangMitchell Yang EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking 2012 * Channel Estimation Techniques Based on Pilot Arrangement in OFDM Systems SinemColeri MustafaErgen AnujPuri AhmadBahai IEEE Trans. on Broadcasting 48 2002 * Pilot-Symbol-Aided Channel Estimation for OFDM in Wireless Systems Ye (geoffrey)Li IEEE transactions on vehicular technology 49 2000. 2012 Gunther Auer IEEE transactions on communications * Preamble and pilot symbol design for channel estimation in OFDM systems with null subcarriers ShuichiOhno EmmanuelManasseh MasayoshiNakamoto EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking 2011 * Channel Estimation and Combining Orthogonal Pilot Design in MIMO-OFDM System WangLiping Journal of Networks 9 2014 * JunCai XueminShen JonWMark 2004 Robust Channel * Communication Systems-An H ? Approach IEEE Trans. on Wireless Communication 3 * on H? equalization of communication channels TAlper BabakErdogan ThomasHassibi Kaileth IEEE transactions on signal Processing 48 2000 * Join Data and Kalman Estimation for Rayleigh fading Channel MJOmidi MPasupathy PGGulak 1999. 1999 Wireless personal communication * Introduction to Random Signal and Applied Kalman Filtering, 3 rd Ed RobertGrover Brown YCPatrick Hwang 1997 John Wily & Sons * Properties of Risk sensitive filters/Estimators RNBanavar JLSpeyer IEE Proc.-Control Theory Appl 145 1998 * Robustness and risk sensitive filtering ReneKBoel MatthewRJames IanRPeterson IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 47 2002 * Risk sensitive particle filter for mitigating sample impoverishment UUrguner FGustafsson IEEE Transactions on signal processing 56 2008 * Robust Steady-State Filtering for Systems With Deterministic and Stochastic Uncertainties FanWang VenkataramananBalakrishnan IEEE Trans. On Signal Processing 51 2003 * Risksensitive filtering, prediction and smoothing for discrete-time singular systems HZhang LXie YCSoh Automatica 39 2003 * Risk Sensitive Filters for Recursive Estimation of Motion from Images MJayakumar RNBanavar IEEE Trans. of Pattern and Machine Intelligence 20 1998 * Risk Sensitive Filtering and Parameter Estimation JasanFord DSTO-TR- 0764 1999 Melbourne, Australia DSTO Aeronautical and Maritime Research Laboratory Technical Report * Robust Fading Channel Estimation under Parameter and Process Noise Uncertainty with Risk Sensitive Filter and Its comparison with CRLB KPrasad MSrinivasan TSatya Savithri WSEAS transactions on communications 13 2014