( ) Figure 13 VI. Discussion and Conclusions The examinations in this segment chiefly take after the characteristic method for advancement of this proposition. After a review of the primary goals and difficulties this study confronted, a rundown of the principle attributes of the models created is exhibited and after that the experimental discoveries are condensed. # b) Discussion -Revisiting the SISP Literature The point of this segment is to analyze the experimental discoveries from Chapter 6 with the discoveries of the key references examined in Chapter 2. # c) Research Hypotheses The model for SISP appraisal and the philosophy utilized gave a way to increasing more subjective experiences into the connections of the variables affecting the SISP process. One of the primary commitments to the SISP hypothesis is demonstrating the need to expand the SISP hypothesis by looking into the development of key IS arranging process essentially, i.e. isolation of SISP development from IS/IT and an association's development. # e) Limitations of the Research All through this study particular constraints are highlighted. Here is a synopsis of confinements which naturally apply to this sort of examination. # VII. Future Expansion a) Future Expansions Further research in adjusting the apparatuses taking into account this structure particularly for the appraisal and estimation could augment the utilization of the instruments for proactive and responsive (feed forward and criticism) control of SISP procedures. 1![Figure 1](image-2.png "Figure 1 K") 212![Figure 2.1: Strategic Alignment Model](image-3.png "Figure 2 . 1 :Figure 2 1.") 8910![Figure 8](image-4.png "Figure 8 Figure 9 Figure 10 20") 2017![Strategic ERP [Enterprise Resource Planning] System Planning in Alignment with Business Planning for its Improvements ( ) C Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology Volume XVII Issue II Version I © 2017 Global Journals Inc. (US) 1 d) Implications for SISP Theory a) Summary of the Research Work](image-5.png "22 Year 2017") ![](image-6.png "") ![](image-7.png "") ![](image-8.png "") ![](image-9.png "") ![](image-10.png "") ![](image-11.png "") SHAREHOLDER Sugar ERP Modules AGRICULTURE CANE DEVELOPMENT CROPLOAN 3. A decent arrangement or only an arrangement: A point by point arrangement is exceptionally fundamental for fruitful usage. All ventures of this size begin with some sort of arrangement. Add Delete a) SISP Maturity Model Sugarcane Slip Sugar Slip Weighbridge Module Molasses Bagasse Slip IV. Proposed System (SISP) Maturity Model Update are substituted with mean values. Table 0.1 in Appendix V. Analysis of Earlier Data and Results E lists the scales against which initial items (variables) a) Data Analysis are checked for inter-correlation using principal Database i. Data Preparation component factor analysis (PCA).WEIGHBRIDE RESERVE STORES INVENTORY Missing data and outliers are not a problem in TRANSPORT CANE ACCOUNT FIXED DEPOSIT SUGAR SALES GODOWN PURCHASE FAS DISTILLERY SUGAR 4. Low maintenance venture administration this study; a few missing points in two questionnaires 5. Under-assessing assets required: Most basic botch to happen is with assets anticipated. Having a KCP Sugar Unit, Lakshmipuram, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh, India Integration With Weigh Machine Weighbridge Module Shift Wise i. Introduction: In this Chapter, a definitional point of Pressmud Slip Briquettes view of SISP development is exhibited. SISP development levels are characterized as 'Options'. At that point, taking into account the Integral strong comprehension of the inward and outside Engineering approach a SISP appraisal model is SEASON WISE CANE CRUSHED, SUGAR BAGGED AND RECOVERY assets expected to finish the undertaking is basic. produced. Weight Slip Report 2015-16 2014-15 2013-14 -2012-13 -2011-12 2010-11 -2009 -10 2008-09 -2007-08 -2006-07 -SEASON PRODUCTION HRMS ZONE SAMITI DIESEL Home Factory Out Detail Daily 4x4 Report Compost & Pressmud Ledger Other Slip ii. UML Diagrams for Proposed SISP Maturity Model KCP SUGAR ERP SY STEM Cane Crushed in MTS 2,84,686 2,70,236 2,85,464 2,27,847 2,81,847 2,75,222 1,50,759 1,35,957 2,74,19 3 4,53,307 QTLS 2,53,263 2,34,100 2,74,470 2,06,768 2,41,447 2,50,160 1,29,206 1,22,68 6 2,68,948 4,67,905 Sugar bagged in19 Year 2017Recovery (%)8.98.679.629.118.879.098.589.059.810.32SUGARERPModulesCEO,MD,ED,Boardof DirectorsWEIGHBRIDGEMODULEACCOUNTINGMODULEFigure 6TRANSPORTMODULE( )Figure 5 Activate SystemLogin Cane Crushed in MTSFigure 3 System checkinvalidvalidSelect TaskData EntryView ReportStrategic ERP [Enterprise Resource Planning] System Planning in Alignment with Business Planning for its Improvements ( ) C Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology Volume XVII Issue II Version I © 2017 Global Journals Inc. (US) C Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology Volume XVII Issue II Version I © 2017 Global Journals Inc. (US)Year 2017 © 2017 Global Journals Inc. (US) 1 © 2017 Global Journals Inc. (US)Year 2017 © 2017 Global Journals Inc. (US) © 2017 Global Journals Inc. (US) Year 2017 Strategic ERP [Enterprise Resource Planning] System Planning in Alignment with Business Planning for its Improvements * Information Architecture BRAllen ACBoyton Search of Efficient Flexibility 1991 15 * Information technology, strategic decision making approach and organizational performance in different industrial settings JTAndersen Journal of Strategic Information System 2001 * Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach JCAnderson DWGerbing Psychological Bulletin 103 3 1988 * Essentials of Modern Business Statistics DRAnderson DJSweeney TAWilliams 2004 Thomson South-Western India * Business reengineering-the survival guide DCAndrews SKStalick 1994 Prentice Hall London * Identifying Strategic Management Information Systems Planning Parameters Using Case Studies JAng NShaw FPavri International Journal of Information Management 15 6 1995 * Planning and Control Systems, a Framework for Analysis RNAnthony 1965 Harvard University Press Boston, MA * Information Technology and Tomorrow's Manager' LMApplegate JICash QDMills Harvard Business Review 66 6 1988 * Amos 4.0 User Guide. Small weather Corporation JLArbuckle WWothke 1999 Chicago